|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
June 24, 2002 |
|||||||
ISU's involvement on national
committee
|
|||||||
|
TERRE HAUTE, Ind. —
Indiana State University’s
participation as a cooperating university on the National Academy of
Education (NAE) Committee on Teacher Education (CTE) has reaffirmed
that the School of Education is doing things right when it comes to
educating teachers. Diana
Quatroche, associate professor of elementary and early childhood
education, has been serving since last fall as ISU’s institutional
liaison to the project. “Serving
on this committee makes me feel very good about our program,”
Quatroche said. “When you look at the knowledge base that this
committee suggests is important, they are things that we already
include in our program.” ISU is one
of seven universities in the country chosen to serve as cooperating
universities on the committee. The others are New York University,
Stanford University, the University of Georgia, the University of
Texas at El Paso, Vanderbilt University and Xavier University of
Louisiana. Linda Darling-Hammond of Stanford University and John D.
Bransford of Vanderbilt University are co-chairs of the Committee on
Teacher Education. Funded by a
two-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education, the Committee
on Teacher Education brings together researchers, teacher educators
and practitioners from around the United States to reach a consensus
on the essential knowledge base for new teachers. The group’s
“Statement of Consensus” lists the main purpose of the group as
providing “teacher educators, research and policy makers with
clear guidance on central ideas that should guide teacher education
curriculum.” The
cooperating university liaisons have met twice with the Committee on
Teacher Education, most recently in New York City. The main issues
the Committee on Teacher Education is evaluating are:
“What
they’re basically talking about are best practices,” said Dean
of the School of Education C. Jack Maynard. “It’s a consensus on
best practices from some of the best minds in the country.”
Maynard has said ISU’s involvement on the committee is an
excellent opportunity for the university to demonstrate a leadership
role in the field of teacher education. “It’s not by accident
that we were invited here,” he said, adding that his hope is that
ISU will continue to receive reaffirmation that it is “doing the
right work,” but that the School of Education will also bring new
ideas from its participation. For
example, NYU invites its education graduates back to campus
periodically on Friday evenings for networking. It’s a great way
to continue to support new teachers after they’ve graduated,
Maynard and Quatroche agreed. The NAE
Committee on Teacher Education is in the process of writing parts of
a report that is expected to be put into a book and made available
for purchase. The university liaisons, along with CTE members,
review and respond to drafts of the report. The main
volume will be for educators and researchers. Volume II, an
executive summary, will be for policymakers and the general public.
The first volume is expected to be released in about a year. The
committee’s work is expected to be complete by Dec. 30, 2003. Chapters in
the report are expected to include:
The
liaisons and CTE members responded to two drafts at the June meeting
— content knowledge and pedagogy, and child and adolescent
development. “The
interesting part is that although there is a lot of discussion
around topics, issues and ideas, people agree on the main
principles,” Quatroche said. Some of the
cooperative university liaisons talked about the importance of
portfolios, for example, and how they should be utilized more —
something ISU has been doing for years. Committee members also
discuss the need for more clinical experience before students
graduate. “Indiana
State has so many clinical settings so often and so early,”
Maynard said. “by the time a student gets to their student
teaching, they’ve already been in six different clinical
settings.” Quatroche
and Maynard agreed that a teacher’s knowledge of subject matter is
important, but there are so many more things a teacher needs to know
to be successful. “The
committee realizes that content background is very important, but to
succeed in the classroom everybody needs to know how to teach
effectively,” Quatroche said. “It’s
not A or B — content or pedagogy — you can’t succeed without
both of them,” Maynard said. -30- Contact: Writer: Public Affairs: |
|||||||